Posts tagged iPod

Apple goes back to the future – with Mac

For most of the year, Apple has focused on the fastest-growing, most lucrative portion of its business — the iPad and iPhone, which run the iOS operating system. Now it’s going back to where it all started.

Last night, Apple showed off the little side business of making computers that run the Mac OS X operating system, the performance of which would have made a bigger splash in previous years.

At the “Back to the Mac” media event at Apple’s campus in Cupertino, the company previewed the next major version of Mac OS X (dubbed “Lion”), introduced iLife ’11 and a new FaceTime application for videoconferencing, and released a new version of the MacBook Air notebook.

Quite a showing when you consider the company has this year already launched the iPad and the iPhone 4.

We were beginning to think Apple didn’t have any fuel left.

But the focus wasn’t intended just to bolster the strength of the Mac market. CEO Steve Jobs said “back to the Mac” refers to a blending of technologies.

He said, “We’re inspired by some of those innovations in the iPad and iPhone, and we’d like to bring them back to the Mac.”

Apple has incorporated many features of the iPhone and iPad iOS operating system into Mac OS X Lion, due to ship next summer.

One such feature is the finger-based multitouch gestures that are the primary way of interacting with the iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch.

So what’s next?

Too sexy for Apple?

Believe it or not but Apple has finally got something wrong, upsetting customers – and no, I’m not talking about the iPad.

Apple has begun enforcing stricter policies around apps available from its app store in a move that could see some apps removed entirely.

While the tech giant has so far only removed adult-themed apps, some games have also been removed.

Techcrunch reports that no more applications with “overtly sexual content” will be allowed, however, the criteria in which apps on the Apple store will be measured remain unclear.

The policy is expected to alarm some developers, and like other attempts to censor internet content, could see some apps banned for no reason at all – or at least in a case of misunderstanding (think of how in India you can’t look up ‘sex discrimination laws’ because the search term ‘sex’ is banned.

The news has already prompted many scathing opinions and blog posts on Mac enthusiasts sites such as cultofmac.com and 9to5mac.com. Blog posts on the sites are warning developers to make sure they don’t feature any “sexy women in apps” deeming the bans “ridiculous”.

The pulling of apps is in response to what is being dubbed as “sexy apps”, which also includes porn.

The move comes at a rather convenient time, with many touting that the clean-up attempt is to ready the market for its iPad, which is due to hit stores next month.

The iPad is expected to be popular with schools – carrying textbooks.

It seems that no medium is safe from censorship these days. And it isn’t necessarily a bad thing. For years, the internet has known no or little inhibitions – there were no clear boundaries and anything and everything was available for download. We called it freedom. And until the internet giants got on board with censoring content available through their sites, there was no way to apply any laws on the world wide web as it isn’t confined to any one jurisdiction.

But the question is now, how much power should these ‘internet giants’ have over what content can and can’t be seen – and furthermore, what is too “sexy”?

Is Microsoft cool enough to have its own mobile phone?

It’s Mobile World Congress this week and the perfect time for new players to enter the market. But can tech giant Microsoft pull it off?

Do you remember the days when software and technology companies would only really offer one product, but that product would actually be really good? Everyone would have it and it just became the norm. Microsoft loved those days, the days before it had so many competitors, days when it didn’t have to ‘cool’, it was just geeky.

Now, brand is more important than ever, and even more important for companies is that they now need to be seen with their fingers in many pies – that they’re down with the kids.

Microsoft will this week unveil the Microsoft Windows 7 for Mobile operating system, but what’s even more interesting is it will also be unveiling Windows 7 Mobile handsets.

Microsoft has been pretty busy these past couple of years – busy competing that is.

You have to remember that Microsoft could once do no wrong. It’s products weren’t very sexy but they certainly made our lives easier. But the company perhaps become a little complacent, it took its eyes off the ball and started building Xbox.

Then it had to play catch-up, that’s what Zune was all about. Bing is more about looking for other revenue streams while it watches Apple steal away customers (although Microsoft still has a ninety-something share of the OS market, people are switching because Apple is cooler).

So now it is building a mobile phone. This is perhaps Microsoft’s last chance to really hit the market place big time and offer something unique that will finally set it aside from it’s competitors such as Google and Apple.

The phone, which looks similar to a Blackberry, will have to be a ‘must have’ item. But will it be hot and sexy enough to attract consumers to camp out at mobile phone retailers to be first to have one?

Microsoft’s decision to enter the mobile phone market reflects a broader push inside the company to bring a bigger element of ‘cool’ to its brand – which is usually known as ‘functional’ (I am here reminded of those Window 7 ads…there was no one cool in those, just people functioning, often stupidly).

But it’ll have to go some way to convince consumers.

Microsoft’s early lead in smartphone software was built on its strong practical appeal to corporate IT departments, which wanted to move applications they had developed for other Windows operating systems on to mobile handsets.

It’s popular with the geeks – but even they are losing interest. The company’s share of the smartphone business has withered as consumers have turned to cooler handsets and often kept these for work as well.

According to comScore, Microsoft’s share of smartphone software had slipped to 18% in the US in the final quarter of last year, while Apple’s iPhone claimed 25% of the market.

There certainly is a lot of ground to catch up on for Microsoft. The handset won’t just have to ‘wow’ consumers, it’ll have to shock them. And the ad campaign will have to be a hell of a lot better than those Windows 7 ads.

The Apple doesn’t fall far from the tree – the tablet I mean

While everyone eagerly awaits Apple’s new product launch tonight, we cast your mind back to the very first tablet device – the Newton

In my excitement in waiting for Apple’s announcement of its new “exciting product” tonight (27/01), I was doing some digging on the internet trying to learn all I could about this proposed tablet (by the way, I prefer the name iPad, it goes well with iPod, iPhone – see, all P’s). But one thing that I had forgotten about was Apple’s Newton – a tablet like device the tech giant produced in 1989.

I barely remember 1989, and I certainly wasn’t tech savvy back then. If I really think about it, I didn’t have a phone, an MP3 (or a walkman I suppose), a personal computer or even a Gameboy. I don’t actually remember anyone back then needing as much technology as we carry around with us today.

So, this is precisely why the Newton failed. There was no need for it.  

For those of you who don’t remember or were perhaps too young (yes, I fall into the latter category) I’ll give you a quick rundown of the Newton.

The Newton platform was an early personal digital assistant hardware/software platform developed by Apple that included that fun colourful Apple logo.

Most Newton devices were based on the ARM 610 RISC processor and all featured handwriting recognition software – back then, this was cool. The Newton project was a PDA platform. Newton was intended to be a complete reinvention of personal computing. For most of its design lifecycle Newton had a large-format screen, more internal memory, and an object-oriented graphics kernel.

The project, however, missed its original goals to reinvent personal computing and then to rewrite contemporary application programming. Apple was also scared that the device would interfere with Macintosh sales and the Newton was scrapped.

It has now been hailed as the “grandfather” of the iPhone – a device that was clearly before its time.

Fast forward 20 years and we are eagerly awaiting a bigger and better Newton. Steve Jobs himself did say that the company had been working on this new product for the past 10 years, but that he had always had it in his mind.

So what will make a tablet like device a success today?

1.       Our incessant need for technology

2.       Advertisers