Why is traditional advertising dead?
By Jim Boulton, Deputy MD, Story Worldwide
Advertising spending is plummeting, the recession has led to a re-evaluation of frivolous spending on the part of brands and consumers alike, and messages conveyed through traditional advertising no longer have any value. Consumers will no longer idly sit through static, one-way advertising and brands will no longer pay for it. The only way brands can connect with customers is by genuinely adding value to their lives, either by providing them with useful tools or telling them informative and entertaining stories that audiences actually want to hear. Imagine that.
The trend is clear: smart brands have recognised traditional advertising only works when it’s not advertising. Wieden & Kennedy’s brilliant ads for Honda work because they are genuinely engaging. Rather than being mere sign-posts towards products, they have value in their own right. People (let’s not call them consumers) no longer passively accept products being relentlessly rammed down their throat and then dutifully nip off down the shops. Brands need to create brand experiences that are a positive use of peoples’ time so that when they decide to buy, the brand in question is thought of favourably.
Those brands that survive in the post-advertising era recognise that the age of persuasion is over and instead invest their advertising budgets in great content, as Honda are doing with W&K and Stella Artois is doing with Mother. However, those brands that not only survive but thrive in the post-advertising era, will be the ones that are not only interesting to their audiences but are interested in their audiences, which is where traditional advertising, even if it is great advertising, falls down.
The purpose of a piece of branded content, of which an advert is one example, is not only to grab the audience’s attention but critically to stimulate a positive conversation about the brand. It is no longer enough for a brand to tell people it’s great, it has to encourage its customers to do so. This leads us to a potentially counter-intuitive conclusion and a premise that sits at the centre of post-advertising – longer acquisition cycles are a good thing!
Traditional advertising tries to convert a customer at every touch point, taking them from brand awareness to customer in one foul swoop. Post-advertising purposefully extends the customer acquisition cycle, believing that the more times a brand and a customer engage before purchase, the more likely the customer is to be loyal. Not only are loyal customers marketing nirvana, with low costs to service and high chances of advocacy, they are repeatedly given opportunities to endorse during the course of the acquisition process. Every time a brand stimulates a positive response, it has a ripple effect, which encourages more branded conversations and greater advocacy.
Post-advertising turns marketing on its head. It’s not about selling, it’s about caring. It’s not about conversions, it’s about engagement. And crucially, it’s not about short-term profits, it’s about long-term revenues.








July 13, 2010 - 12:04 pm
I couldn’t agree more with Jim’s view. Customers are savvy, they don’t need or want a brand to tell them a product is good, they need to know why it’s good and how it can benefit them.
As a flippant (though apposite) example, look at the success of the iPhone; utility and advocacy from the ground up fed into traditional ‘above-the-line’ brand messaging. Early adopters used the iPhone and became firm advocates. Their enthusiasm combined with an obvious wider consumer utility stormed the market.
It is simple when you take the time and develop the know-how.
July 13, 2010 - 1:18 pm
Rather like the premature announcement of the death of Mark Twain, such pronouncements about the ‘death of traditional advertising’ have over-shot the truth. The previous story on this page about global ad revenue going up 18% is not as a result of a ‘crowd-sourced’ tree-hugging online banner ad. Advertising is not entertainment although of course it can be entertaining – it is about getting a commercial message across. Engagement has always been a successful tool in the ad agency’s armoury (remember Heiniken ads from the 70′s?). Advertising has always evolved as both consumers and media have. It is not dead – its alive and kicking.
Michael Moszynski
CEO LONDON Advertising
July 13, 2010 - 4:53 pm
Find out more about our views on the world at http://www.storyworldwide.com/post_advertising.php
July 15, 2010 - 10:23 am
Hi Michael, my argument is that advertising now has to be entertaining (or useful) in some way to have any chance of getting the commercial message across, it’s no longer an option. The Honda and Stella ads are great, in exactly the same way as the Heineken and Hamlet ads were in the 70s, because they are entertaining, not because they get a commercial message across. Brands only have a right to try and sell to people once they have earned it.